They charged him with murder because his son had access to a gun. The FBI had been called about the boy threatening to shoot up the school a year earlier. They visited the home. The father told him his son had access to weapons and they deer hunt together. The FBI concluded the father needed to get his child away from violent video games. The father agreed. Now, the father is being charged with murder for doing exactly what the FBI told him to do. The FBI was comfortable with the boy having access to guns.
In the same situation, I would have gotten my son into counseling and locked up the guns. The mother had just left the home. The boy complained about being bullied at school. He had all of the classic makings of a school shooter. But, to charge the father with murder when he followed the FBI's advice, I think was far too much. Any thoughts on this subject?
|