I thought about it due to the "permanent damage" thread and the old trope about Mistresses hating men so they beat and punish them. And you could legitimately ask me, "How the hell do you know the sexual preferences of Mistresses you've sessioned with?"

In my case, while activities by Mistresses on video may not accurately portray their sexual preferences, in at least two or three cases I've seen videos of dominant women I sessioned with engaged in erotic and BDSM activities with each other. I asked one of the ladies once, and she said there was an attraction. Years ago, it was well known dominatrix I knew, she had a female partner and the pictures I saw of the partner were gorgeous. Yet with me the Mistress seemed completely heterosexual. Maybe it was all upsell marketing and sales talk. The bottom line for me was and is, I don't care what the sexuality of a Mistress is. All that I care about is the interaction between the dominatrix in who is in the room with me for an hour or more. If the Mistress and I are having a good time, I don't care what her sexual preferences are outside of the scene. I've never met a Mistress who "hated men." Bossy, annoying, lousy at sessions Mistresses, sure. In a couple of cases Dominas way too elderly or too high to do a session. I've either endured them in the first case or walked out in the second. No one "hated" me.

The longer I live the more I think that sexuality, or sexual identity, is fluid. Hell, my kinks now are fluid, doing things I would never have done as a youngster. Thoughts?

Last edited by jbeast; 09/30/2024 10:27 AM. Reason: typos