Domspeak Forums Discussions Off Topic & Politics Harris: Blame Others & Government Control

Harris's answer to grocery prices is government regulation of the prices. She is blaming price gouging, although she doesn't know how to pronounce the word. Her answer to affordable housing is to blame the realtors and regulating their commissions. Taking responsibility, identifying actual problems and coming up with effective solutions is, apparently, out of the question for Democrats. They, obviously, have no intention to offer real help with either issue. But, boy, doesn't Harris's spiel sound good to naive college students?

When the government controls grocery stores, expect to stand in line, be grateful for the few options you have and be beholden to them in order to feed your family. They've control the dairy industry with their take over. They have take over farmer's seeds. Welcome to Haiti.

The National Association of Realtors issued a statement. https://www.nar.realtor/newsroom/in...housing-crisis-realtorsr-say-marketwatch

They could have gone a lot further. Interest rates are a factor. Investment companies buying up affordable housing, which they commonly do with curbside cash offers, and rent them out for absorbent prices, is a considerable factor. In blue states, there is financial incentive to rent to illegal immigrants. In some areas, the investment companies are stacking them in a rental, as full as they can and making bank. There are numerous other reasons. This comes to the top of mind.

I do believe there is some gouging. Think about the bacon shrinkflation you posted about. When sales dropped, the company was quick to go back to a pound. However, I see government regulating food prices turning into a nightmare very quickly. Let the consumer do that by picking and choosing where they shop and what brands they buy.

Just imagine that these Democrats/Communists and their media is selling this Communist Piece of FILTH Kamala Harris to the American people....Without one single person in America voting for this Trash......

It's never happened like this EVER as far as I know.......

You know Goddamn well they are going to cheat in those 5-6 swing states.....Especially Pennsylvania....

A little birdie told me something about Pennsylvania....

Apparently all the cheating takes place in Philadelphia....The Democrats have an army of volunteers who literally go house to house with filled in ballots....They mostly go after minorities who are on government benefits.....They have an actual list of about 97,000 names/addresses.....All they want is their signature on the prefilled ballots....If these people refuse then they are THREATENED with the loss of their welfare benefits...

How do you like those apples?

An entire country DESTROYED by these people....

Most People have no FUCKING IDEA what Communism is until after they are dead..

Btw,

Here is some Free advice....Avoid your "Friend"....because she is not your "Friend".....just my opinion.....And trust me, I have done the same in my little world with so called "friends".... I want nothing to do with them anymore....

I know you are trying to be a diplomat but there is no diplomacy in this world anymore. BOTTOM LINE: It will soon be everyone for themselves after they steal this shit...

These people have all followed the great lie (for selfish reasons).....By the greatest liar of them all. Satan....This is a fact....And I believe you know this....

PS.

Just look at the way these people respond to Barrack Obama....They literally gravitate to his every word as if he were Jesus Christ himself.. I have news for them...He is the exact opposite.. He is pure evil and so is his race baiting wife.....(Does Revelations ring a bell?)

Does the "Mark of the Beast" ring a bell?

Enclosure:

I agree with most of what you say here. I'm not optimistic when it comes to a fair election. In fact, there is constant election interference with the way the deceptive manner in which the media presents current issues. The "Disinformation" censorship is nothing more than withholding the truth from the American people. I would like to see Trump get back on having a simple and clear message. It threw him off having the candidate switched at the last minute. You'd think he would have planned for that possibility. I didn't hear his latest speech in PA. But, I have heard prominent Trump supporters express concern that he's getting off message.

You are going to love this, there are credible whispers that Kennedy Jr. will drop out and endorse Trump, who will give him a place in his administration. For all of the good and bad of Kennedy Jr., I think it would be a good thing. Obviously, Kennedy will bring many of his voters with him. But, if he gets back to the original messages he began with such as drastically reforming the very corrupt government agencies, I'd be happy about it. It is a cautious hope for me about Kennedy because it could be what Trump needs to get over the finish line. If Trump has such a very high percentage of the votes in swing states, perhaps, it will be enough to overcome the Democrat's cheating.

I heard that about RFK too....But he would literally have to drop out of the race and take himself off the ballots in those few states he is on them...

It would help Trump but I think he will still be on the ballot in those swing states after he drops out...Stealing 5-10% of the voters..

Much like Nicki Haley did...She dropped out but was still on the ballot for months....Thousands still voted for her. (Yes there are stupid Americans who dont deserve to vote)...

Personally, I would like to see it go back to ONLY property owners can vote....But that is just me.

"Personally, I would like to see it go back to ONLY property owners can vote....But that is just me."

I'd like to see it be property owners, tax payers and retired people who have put their dues in paying taxes but may be exempt in their later years. We know that will never happen. The left wants high school students and illegals to be able to vote.

That would open the market for the sale of a square inch in a swamp.
If you're looking for filter on voters, I would suggest military service or equivalent.
Another viable filter would be voting age limited to a range of 35 to 75.

I am OK with the 35-75 voting age (better than allowing ILLEGALS, 16 year olds and welfare cases the right to vote)......But I have zero military service (so I would be excluded from voting under your proposal) ... However I would bet dollars to donuts that I can out debate most military people on issues regarding the law, politics, philosophy, history and the Constitution...(And crush the SNOT out of them too)

The truth is I never voted once in my entire life except for Trump twice....No bullshit...

Why? Because I know first hand how corrupt this political system is.....

The Worst offenders are the judges....Most judges are just politicians in Black robes....That's the dirty little secret most Americans don't understand..

It looks like the military requirement wouldn't have affected you much.

Debating skills should be evaluated by those who watch.
If you debate someone trying to make a political point, the military would not be your debating adversaries, but your judges.

I'm not much for age restrictions in voting. If someone is deemed fit to serve in the military, they should be permitted to vote. I'm curious about the 75 year old age restriction too. Why? My mother exceeds that age. She's a pistol and stays tuned into politics. She has been volunteering as a poll worker since she retired. She teaches Sunday school too. The woman doesn't slow down.

Age selection may be arbitrary, but it doesn't discriminate against any particularly group--everyone has the same 40 year span to vote.
They may participate financially and be politically active. They may even hold office if those in the voting range thought they were right for the job.
At 35, most have had about 10 years of experiencing real life away from biases inherent in our educational system and, yes, our military.
If the young see a wrong, their vote would have little effect on immediate change and they would be able to vote their cause to fix what they felt was wrong when they were younger.
Similarity, at 75, their vote would probably do little to affect their remaining years.
Those in the voting range would have a chance to build an acceptable senior policy that they would soon be subject to.

In short, the voting span would reduce the inexperienced and immature voters as well as the older less-responsive-to-change and mentally deteriorating voters.
Obviously, there are exceptions for many outside that range.
For example, my brilliant perspective was lost when I was 20 (LBJ won) and my brilliance would be lost now if my suggestion was in place.
But if everyone was subject to the same rules, I would have had my fair share of voting influence.

If a bill was passed to take away mine and my family's vote, I'd have a real problem with that. None of us have served military time. Between my children, mother and her sisters, more than a few are not in the age range you prefer. We all are contributing members to society who have a vested interest in seeing this country succeed. What I would like to see is stupid people banned from voting. I'm sure you've seen some of the shows when a news personality goes to public areas and asks people who they are voting for and why. Maybe they pull out the worst answers. From what I can see, low information voters aren't regulated to age or military service.

My idea has no chance of being implemented. It's just a fantasy.
If it ever was implemented, it would probably have some sort of grandfather clause to ease its implementation.
I think my idea would be the most fair and the country's voting block would be in the age range that is best able to evaluate the issues.

LOL. I love it.

Gotcha. I corrected a typo, btw. I meant stupid people banned from voting. It is all a pipe dream, however we look at it anyway.

Bummer. I liked the way it came out in the original.

I am listening to RFK now.....As he endorses Trump....The problem is that his name will still be on the ballots because it is too late to take his name off..Unless I am mistaken.....Maybe Trump should dump Vance and take RFK as VP.....

He took himself off the ballots in battleground states but left himself on in states that he believe his name will have no influence. He explained that if Trump and Harris tie, somehow he could still win the White House. I don't understand that. I don't want to field back through his long speech to find the part in which he talks about this. Hopefully, someone will shed some light on this. I wish he'd just take his name off entirely. There is time if he files the paperwork soon. He said that he would be joining Trump's campaign, whatever that means.

If it weren't for pressure from his liberal wife, I believe there was a strong possibility that he'd already be Trump's VP pick. That ticket would have been unstoppable. As it is now, Vance would have to be accepting and stay on in support. Somehow, I doubt that will happen.

"He took himself off the ballots in battleground states"

Unfortunately what he wants and says are different from reality......As of now he is on the ballots in 23 states and it might be too late to take himself off without a court order....

I believe Pennsylvania and Michigan already said NO...He will remain as minority candidate....

Btw,

He is at Trumps rally right now with Trump.....So I am going to have to retract the bad things I said about him lol....He is doing the right thing now.....Yeah they would make an unstoppable team......

Now this is said tongue in cheek!


More and more submissives, slaves, masochist, etc. etc. are finding it increasingly difficult to afford our addiction to dominant women as inflation has driven Dominatrix rates to $400 an hour, or more!!!

Harris has my vote if she will pledge to set up price controls for the hourly rates Dommes charge with a goal to bring them back down to the $100 to $200 per hour range. If she can't overcome the fierce Dominatrix lobby and their PAC money, than she can still have my vote with a federal program that provides monthly financial assistance to those needing the services of a professional Dominatrix. There should not be a means test associated with qualifying for this federal assistance, that would be very demeaning and stigmatizing to those of us who need it. A simple 1 page form attesting to our need and stating we are unable to afford these services is all that should be necessary. Just asking for the same consideration the federal and state governments currently provide to our undocumented newcomers.

OK, one other way Harris can earn my vote. If the two options above are not doable, then I will reluctantly settle for a federal income tax credit for $5k ( that's about 1 session per month at $400 an hour). That is hardly excessive or indulgent.

In addition to helping keep BDSM clients happy and productive, these federal programs would also generate new jobs as many women inclined to be dominant could enter the profession knowing that there will be an expanding, hell even explosive demand for Dominatrix services. Sorta like the jobs being created by the new green deal and the inflation reduction act.

You are all welcome!!

Jack

LOL. I love this! Actually, I've seen men experience mild depression when they aren't getting regular sessions. Regulating healthcare to cover sessions as therapy would be a good thing for everyone, even the unsuspecting wife at home. Doesn't every woman want a cheerful husband? Of course, prodoms would need to become familiar with filing insurance claims and getting approval. ;-)