Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#189 03/05/2024 05:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 539
Likes: 57
addict
OP Online Content
addict

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 539
Likes: 57
This is being touted as a win for Trump. But, I see it as a win for the country. If states can declare someone guilty of a crime they've never even been charged with and remove them from a ballot, that is dangerous territory.

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 78
Likes: 10
journeyman
Offline
journeyman

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 78
Likes: 10
I agree. Let the voters decide.

Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 70
Likes: 5
journeyman
Offline
journeyman

Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 70
Likes: 5
I agree as well. I have nothing but distain for Trump but think it should be up to the voters.


Black leather and a fur coat....a match made in heaven
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 274
Likes: 17
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 274
Likes: 17
[quote=Cheyenne]This is being touted as a win for Trump. But, I see it as a win for the country. If states can declare someone guilty of a crime they've never even been charged with and remove them from a ballot, that is dangerous territory. [/quote]


This is true but Don't underestimate how corrupt our government is. This 9-0 decision was a no brainer because this was clearly written that "only congress can remove a candidate"...

Ie: If any justice voted no then they would have looked like an idiot......

I think the 9 justices are really trying to play a fast one with the American people by saying "look at us and how we can all agree".....

But the truth is that they might screw him big time in that immunity case......

Last edited by Fahrenheit451; 03/06/2024 03:59 AM.
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 539
Likes: 57
addict
OP Online Content
addict

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 539
Likes: 57
They passed the buck on this one. Every few years the congress and senate flip. I wouldn't want to see the GOP doing this to the DNC any more than what is going on now. John Adams and George Washington warned about a 2 party government and rallied against it. They were right.

Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 33
newbie
Offline
newbie

Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 33

The immediate problem is that the Speaker of the House clearly stated he wants to create a Theocracy and the presumptive nominee of the GOP for the presidency has clearly stated he wants to create a Autocracy with requisite retributions and purges.

Both of these are prohibited by the Constitution of the United States. The document to which these gentlemen have sworn to uphold and the document they both wish to trash.

According the Ancestry I have ancestors who are involved.
Two of my great grandfathers were incinerated by my 1st cousin Queen Mary I, aka Bloody Mary, for being protestants. Although, I believe won of them was selected because he was a religious nut job. More specifically he was a Puritan Archbishop.
This persecution is why the framers of the US Constitution separated Church and State.

The US Constitution obstructs the grand schemes of these guys. So out it goes!

"Bloody" Donald I here we come.

To err is human, or in the case of Texas, Alabama et al - To err is inhuman.
Not to mention the absence of equal justice.

C123

It just a reminder when you throw out the constitution, you throw out ALL of the amendments to.
No Constitution means there is no need for the US Supreme Court.
At this point it seems that elections would tend to interfere, so no need for congress and the senate...
Actually with no constitution there are no elections, supreme court, congress and senate.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5