[quote]
I agree. Looking at it from a non US resident's perspective I have to wonder how a nation got to the point of having to choose which wildly inappropriate and unqualified candidate for president was less detestable.
[/quote]
Trump won the most coveted election, as an outsider. BIG, BIG, BIG donors lost BIG, BIG, BIG money when Hilary Clinton lost.
But for the 63 million or so HRC voters, they just got their feelings hurt, that they voted for the person who did NOT win the election. the next day in the office, people cried and cried and moaned over something that really didn't change their lives at all... except the fact that they didn't pick the winner in the election, and that shame was going to go on their "permanent record."
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/O4epDwpZEto
HRC was going to do the work and bidding of the donor class, you know: War, Foreign Interests, tax breaks for the wealthy.
HRC was never going "to tax the rich more...." she might have said it 100 times, but, instead, she was going to do the bidding of those who wanted tax breaks for the weathy.
HRC was never going to fix equal pay for women, or codify abortion for women.....with the number of women voting in this country....why in the world would anyone fix a problem that guarantees the women's vote, year after year, by NOT fixing the problem?
I guarantee you, "equal pay for women" will never be fixed....it is already law from the 1963-64 civil rights bill.... the fact that women claim that they are now, in 2024, not paid equally to men, is irrelevant....if you are a woman, and think you are not paid like your male co-workers, go take it up with your employer....stop thinking that someone like HRC really cares that you are not paid equally.....
Last edited by coderanger; 03/15/2024 08:22 PM.