Posted by Scooby:
It was not a character attack. It was exposing her horrible lack of judgement.
Response:
You have yet to support your contention that the act was poor judgement.
It can be argued that writing about it was poor judgement politically.
Posted by Scooby:
It does not sound like a potentially dangerous situation.
Response:
A 60 pound dog that cannot be controlled and attempts to bite sounds dangerous to me.
Noem thought it was dangerous and she was there.
Posted by Scooby:
The breed is known to be gentle with people.
Response:
This individual dog apparently was different.
Posted by Scooby:
Her daughter came home and asked where her dog, Cricket, was.
Why would anyone allow a dog who was a danger to people around her children?
Response:
Her daughter is a married adult.
Posted by Scooby:
She added that she hated the dog.
Response:
Does one have to love a dangerous dog before they can take action?
Posted by Scooby:
I'm not buying it. It isn't falling for anything the media said.
Response:
Yet your primary source that you base you opinion is from excerpts provided by the media, a media that will do anything to hamper Trump and his supporters.
No, You fell for the media narration hook, line, and sinker.
Posted by Scooby:
She was looking to make herself look like a badass.
Response:
More like she is indicating that she is capable of doing what is needed to be done despite it not being easy.
Posted by Scooby:
What she did was repulsive to millions of American voters.
The media spun it to make it seem repulsive.
Posted by Scooby:
Cheyenne was right that it was stupid to put this in a book. It was stupid to put a book out when hoping to be on a presidential ticket.
Response:
So bottom line; It's more important to be a polished savvy politician than a capable stateswoman.
Posted by Scooby:
The Trump pussy tape was blown out of context. That isn't what happened here.
Response:
It's exactly what happened here--and for the same reason.
