Cheyenne posted:
You keep making the same points, to my same responses...
Response:
Perhaps if you bothered to read them, address my points, and answer questions, I wouldn't have to repeat myself.
(BTW, I asked you if you made something up. That was rude of me and the fact that I was angry at the time is no excuse. I'm sorry. I should have just asked you for your source.)
===============
Cheyenne posted:
...absurdly, accusing me of following the media machine's narrative. It is a lame insult
Response:
I don't intend to insult, but if I think you are in error, I will mention it.
I believe you have commented on me when you think I'm wrong (or a bullshitter).
===============
Cheyenne posted:
...especially to someone like me that doesn't fall into that garbage [media spin] and often points it out...
Response:
No one is immune. You base many of your opinions on emotion and emotions are what the MSM plays on.
===============
Cheyenne posted:
Noem's stated actions and her own words, without any commentary, did not go over well with a lot of people.
Response:
You've made the point several times that having a "lot of people" agree with you means you're right.
I've shown you examples where that is not the case.
===============
Cheyenne posted:
Do you know the exact area she was living in when she killed her 14 month old canine?
Response:
No I don't. She could be a couple of miles from town or 100 miles away.
I'm as ignorant as you and most other people.
Most I know about her situation comes from the MSM selected quotes.
If there are articles with mitigating facts available, I suspect Google has buried them in search results.
===============
Cheyenne posted:
And, weight has nothing to do with whether a dog is still viewed as a pup.
Response:
Frankly the actual definition of puppy and the owner's perception don't really matter.
The fact is if you call a dog a puppy, most will visualize small animal only a few months old.
More often than not, that visualization will override the effect of any statistic to the contrary.
===============
Cheyenne posted:
So, who are you to declare what people want when you have no experience with rescue?
Response:
So, who are you to declare what people can do when you don't know the circumstances?
Have any of your dogs turned on you with the intent of injuring you?
Have you ever been unable to stop a dog that is acting violently (such as killing chickens?
BTW, did yo ever view the video I linked to? It is short (about 30 seconds if I remember right).
===============
Cheyenne posted:
And, what is the article about "Losing Lulu?' It has incredibly small, light print that is difficult to read, is ungodly wordy and someone's opinion. Again, I get enough of that from Ted. Make your own points instead of finding random articles and videos you found on the internet, trying to make a point you don't really have the education or experience to make.
I made my point with the quote I posted. I provided the link in case you wanted the source of that quote.
I didn't post it for you to evaluate the quality of the site or the quality of writing.
On a technical side, when the print and background make it difficult to read, try highlighting the text.
The highlighted text is easier to read.
